New York City

Photo Credit: Patrick, Tomasso, Unsplash

Financial Markets Rebound in the First Half of 2023

A year can make a big difference. One year ago, the market was trying to catch its breath after a chaotic start to 2022. The Federal Reserve raised interest rates by 1.5% over three months. Inflation touched 9% as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine upended commodity markets, and competition for employees resulted in wage inflation. The S&P 500’s first-half 2022 return was its worst start to a calendar year since 1970. Fast forward 12 months, and the backdrop is markedly different. Oil prices are -33% lower, inflation is running at a 4.1% pace, and the S&P 500 is up +16.7% this year. The following information reviews the second quarter, recaps the solid start for 2023, and discusses the outlook for the year’s second half.

Data Highlights U.S. Economy’s Momentum

While the backdrop has significantly changed, second-quarter economic data highlighted the U.S. economy’s continued resilience. New home sales in the housing market rose more than 10% year-over-year in April and May as tight inventories pushed homebuyers to the new construction market. Personal income, which measures an individual’s total income from wages, investments, and other sources, continued to grow along with wages and interest income. While unemployment rose slightly to 3.7%, companies added 300,000 jobs in April and May. Revised data showed the economy expanded faster in Q1 than previously estimated. First quarter U.S. GDP growth was revised to a 2% annualized pace from the initial 1.3% estimate, reflecting upward revisions to exports and consumer spending.

The data underscores the economy’s momentum but is backward-looking rather than forward-looking. How much longer can the U.S. sustain its economic strength? An index of leading economic data points suggests the U.S. may be near a turning point. Figure 1 compares the year-over-year change in the Leading Economic Index (LEI) against the Coincident Economic Index (CEI). For context, the LEI is an index of ten economic data points whose changes tend to precede changes in the overall economy, such as unemployment claims, building permits, and manufacturing hours worked. The CEI is an index of four data points that tend to move with the economy and indicate the economy’s current state, such as industrial production and personal income. The gray shades represent past U.S. recessions.

Leading Economic Index vs Coincident Economic Index

Leading Economic Index vs Coincident Economic Index

The chart above shows the LEI declining by -8% during the past 12 months, indicating the economy may be approaching a turning point as the Fed’s interest rate hikes take effect. In contrast, the CEI rose +2% over the same period, indicating that the economy remains strong. What does the LEI/CEI divergence imply? Positive CEI doesn’t necessarily mean the economy has avoided a recession, but CEI’s rise does provide additional evidence showing the U.S. economy’s resilience despite higher interest rates. On a related note, the chart shows it’s not uncommon for the LEI to decline even as the CEI remains positive. The red circles highlight prior instances, like today, where LEI declined first and CEI declined later. However, the gay shades show the U.S. economy has been near the start of a recession each time the LEI fell by more than -5% in 12 months.

S&P 500 Companies Beat Q1 Earnings Estimates

Corporate earnings tell a similar story to economic data. While the S&P 500’s earnings declined by -2% year-over-year in the first quarter, many companies reported results that exceeded analysts’ estimates. Figure 2 graphs the percentage of S&P 500 companies beating sales and earnings estimates during the Q1 earnings season. The top chart shows 75% of companies beat their sales estimates in Q1, up from 65% in the prior quarter and above the 5-year average of 69%. From an earnings perspective, 78% of companies beat their estimates, up from 69% in the prior quarter and slightly above the 5-year average of 76%. Like the economy, investors appear to be underestimating corporate earnings strength.

Percent of S&P 500 Companies Beating Quarterly Estimates

Percent of S&P 500 Companies Beating Quarterly Estimates

A look ahead to the Q2 earnings season reveals a dynamic similar to the LEI/CEI divergence. The S&P 500’s earnings are forecasted to decline by -7.1% year-over-year in Q2 2023. Analysts forecasted a -4.7% earnings decline on March 31 before the Q1 earnings season. It’s not uncommon for analysts to revise earnings estimates during earnings season as they get more up-to-date information from companies. The downward revision indicates analysts remain skeptical about companies’ ability to grow earnings in an environment with higher interest rates and the economy returning to trend after strong growth over the past few years. Like economic data, the question is whether the downbeat earnings forecast or Q1’s better-than-expected actual results are more indicative of the path forward.

An Update on the U.S. Banking System

It has been four months since the first signs of bank turmoil in early March, and data indicates the stress is easing. Bank deposits plunged in March after steadily declining for almost a year, but data from the Federal Reserve shows deposits stabilized in Q2. On a related note, there were concerns that deposit outflows would cause banks to slow and shrink their lending activity. However, another Federal Reserve dataset shows loans and leases on bank balance sheets held relatively steady in Q2. While banks are not increasing their lending activity, the data indicates they are not pulling back either.

The data suggests banks are on a more stable footing today, but there are still questions about the banking system. Recent stability doesn’t necessarily rule out the risk of deposits continuing to trend lower, especially with elevated interest rates. In addition, profitability is a concern. Why? Banks make money by charging a higher interest rate on loans than the interest rate they pay on deposits. Now that depositors can earn a higher yield on bonds, banks must pay a higher interest rate on deposits. However, banks’ interest income is still tied to loans made during the past few years when interest rates were lower. An increase in interest expense without an offsetting increase in interest income means banks’ profit margins may decline. In addition, there is concern that banks may lose money on consumer, business, and real estate loans if the economy weakens. The pressure on deposits eased in Q2, but banks may not be in the clear yet.

Equity Market Recap – The Rally Broadens Out

Equity markets are off to a strong start this year. After a steep sell-off in the first half of 2022, the S&P 500 returned +16.7% in the first half of 2023. The year-to-date gain ranks as the fifth strongest first-half return since 1989. The biggest Technology stocks performed even better, with the Nasdaq 100 returning +15.3% in Q2 after its +20.7% Q1 return. The Nasdaq 100’s +39.1% return is the strongest first half-year return since 1989, ranking ahead of 1998 and 1999 during the dot-com bubble. Small-cap stocks also participated in the rally, returning +8.1% through the end of June. The year-to-date equity market gains have lifted portfolios after a difficult 2022.

While the S&P 500’s headline return is impressive, a look underneath the surface tells a different story. Figure 3 compares the performance of the S&P 500 Index against an equal-weight version of the S&P 500 Index. Why is this relevant? The S&P 500 Index is weighted by market cap, which means the biggest stocks can significantly impact the index’s headline return. An equal-weight index neutralizes the impact of the biggest stocks and allows investors to track how the average stock is performing. The chart shows the two versions of the S&P 500 Index traded together in January and February, an indication market cap did not significantly impact performance.

S&P 500 YTD Return (Market Cap Weighted vs Equal Weighted)

S&P 500 YTD Return

However, the market cap and equal-weight versions of the S&P 500 diverged in March, when the first signs of regional bank turmoil appeared. The S&P 500 traded higher in April and May, while the Equal Weight S&P 500 traded sideways. The split indicates the biggest stocks drove a large portion of the S&P 500’s gain in Q2. While the S&P 500 ended the first half of 2023 with a strong return, the average stock’s return was noticeably smaller, indicating the first half rally was top-heavy. Investors will be watching to see if the first-half S&P 500 rally broadens in the second half of the year.

After outperforming in the first quarter, international stocks underperformed U.S. stocks in the second quarter. The MSCI EAFE Index of developed market stocks gained +3.2%, outperforming the MSCI Emerging Market Index’s +1.0% return but underperforming the S&P 500 by -5.5%. Looking across international markets, Latin America was the top-performing international region as both Brazil and Mexico traded higher. Latin America benefits from geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China, pushing investment toward the region. Within developed markets, Asia outperformed Europe as Japanese stocks traded to a 30-year high. The catch – Japanese stocks are only now returning to breakeven after the country’s late-1980s real estate bubble popped, and the stock market crashed.

Credit Market Recap – Riskiest Bonds Outperform Due to Higher Yields

Treasury yields rose sharply in Q2 after ending Q1 lower due to regional bank stress. The 2-year Treasury yield, which is viewed as a proxy for the Federal Reserve policy rate, rose from 4.06% to 4.87%. Over the same period, the 10-year Treasury yield rose from 3.49% to 3.81%. The increases are being attributed to better-than-expected economic data, which could, in turn, force the Fed to raise interest rates higher than previously thought. Rising interest rates weighed on bonds in Q2 with the Bloomberg U.S. Bond Aggregate, an index that tracks a wide array of Treasury, corporate, and other investment grade bonds, producing a -0.9% total return.

While rising interest rates caused bonds to trade lower, high-yield corporate bonds traded higher in Q2, producing a +0.7% total return. The top chart in Figure 4 takes the analysis a step further by comparing the return of CCC bonds, which are the lowest-rated corporate bonds with a higher perceived risk of default, against a broad index of corporate investment grade bonds. The chart shows CCC-rated bonds generated a ~10% total return through June 30th, including price appreciation and interest received. For comparison, investment-grade bonds generated a ~3% total return over the same period. Why are the riskiest corporate bonds outperforming? They offer a higher yield as compensation for taking on more credit risk. An index of corporate investment grade bonds yielded 5.6% on June 30th, while an index of CCC bonds yielded 14.0%, almost 2.5x higher. The higher yield translates into more interest income, helping to boost total return.

Corporate Bond Returns & Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filings

Monthly Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Fillings

Considering another credit market theme this year, the return gap is striking: rising bankruptcy filings. The bottom chart in Figure 4 graphs the monthly number of Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings since 2006. It shows the bankruptcy surge during the 2008 financial crisis, followed by the long tail of bankruptcies through 2013. The number of bankruptcy filings stabilized in 2014 and trended sideways through 2019. While there was a brief spike in 2020, the number of bankruptcy filings was below average in 2021 and 2022. Why did bankruptcy filings decline during the pandemic? Companies benefitted from multiple themes, including low-interest rates, fiscal stimulus, and loose bank lending standards. Those themes made financing plentiful and allowed even highly leveraged companies to refinance their old debt and take out new debt. Rising inflation increased companies’ pricing power and drove strong sales growth, generating higher profit margins.

The far right of the chart shows the tide is turning. The number of bankruptcy filings in March 2023 crossed above the 20-year median for the first time since December 2020, coming back in line with the pre-pandemic trend. What’s driving the increase? Several themes contribute to the sharp rise in bankruptcies, including higher interest rates, tighter bank lending standards, and easing inflation. In summary, higher interest rates and stricter bank lending standards are increasing companies’ financing costs while inflation is easing and companies are starting to lose pricing power. High-yield bonds offer more income near-term, but that income is tied to credit risk. If the number of bankruptcy filings continues to increase, the losses from those defaults could more than offset the extra income investors earn near-term.

Third Quarter Outlook - Can the Good Times Continue?

The first half of 2023 was marked by continued economic resilience and a rebound in the equity market. The U.S. economy outperformed expectations despite the Fed’s aggressive 2022 rate hikes, with new home sales rising, personal income growing, and continued job creation. Corporate earnings exceeded expectations, and the S&P 500 gained over 15%. The riskiest corporate bonds outperformed in the credit market as investors collected higher yields.

As the market enters the second half of 2023, investors are left asking whether the good times can continue. The LEI indicates the U.S. economy may be nearing a turning point, and the economic data may start to show the cumulative effect of the Fed’s interest rate hikes. Plus, there is the potential for additional rate hikes in Q3. While the S&P 500 rally was impressive, it was also top-heavy, with larger stocks driving a significant portion of the gains. Corporate earnings are forecasted to decline, and bankruptcy filings could rise further if borrowers struggle to refinance and profit margins decline.

While the first half of 2023 was relatively calm, the economy and market faced potential challenges in the year’s second half. Our team will continue monitoring conditions as they evolve and will be prepared to adapt portfolios if needed as the second half plays out.

 

Our Insights

Jonathan M. Elliott, CPWA®, CRPC®, CDFA®, ChSNC®, CPFA™, RMA®

I am currently the Managing Partner for our independent investment advisory firm, Optima Capital Management. Together with my business partners, Todd Bendell CFP® and Clinton Steinhoff, we founded Optima Capital in 2019 as a forward-thinking wealth management firm that serves as an investment fiduciary and family office for high-net-worth individuals and families. In addition to being the Chief Compliance Officer, my role at Optima Capital is portfolio management. I have over 18 years of experience in managing investment strategies and portfolios. I specialize in using fundamental and technical analysis to build custom portfolios that utilize individual equities, bonds, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). I began my financial services career with Merrill Lynch in 2003. At Merrill, I served in the leadership roles of Market Sales Manager and Senior Resident Director for the Scottsdale West Valley Market in Arizona. On Wall Street Magazine recognized me as one of the Top 100 Branch Managers in 2017. I am originally from Saginaw, Michigan, and a marketing graduate from the W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University. I am a Certified Private Wealth Advisor® professional. The CPWA® certification program is an advanced credential created specifically for wealth managers who work with high net worth clients, focusing on the life cycle of wealth: accumulation, preservation, and distribution. In addition, I hold the following designations - Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor (CRPC®), Certified Divorce Financial Analyst (CDFA®), Certified Plan Fiduciary Advisor (CPFA), and Retirement Management Advisor (RMA®). In the community, I am a member of the Central Arizona Estate Planning Council (CAEPC) and serve as an alumni advisor and mentor to student organizations at Arizona State University. My interests include traveling, outdoors, fitness, leadership, entrepreneurship, minimalism, and computer science.

Previous
Previous

Navigating the Changing Landscape of Income Generation: Bonds vs. Stocks

Next
Next

An IRA Dilemma: To Roll or Not To Roll