Fall leaves

Photo Credit: Rodolfo Mari, Unsplash

Key Updates on the Economy & Markets

The major development in 3Q24 was the Federal Reserve’s decision to cut interest rates by -0.50%, the first rate cut of this cycle. It came as the Fed shifted its focus, with unemployment rising to a 33-month high and inflation moving back to target. In the equity market, stocks ended the quarter higher despite some turbulence, including a brief but sharp sell-off in early August. The S&P 500 posted its fourth consecutive quarterly gain and ended September near an all-time high. This post recaps 3Q24, discusses the Fed’s first rate cut, examines the increase in market volatility, and looks ahead to the final quarter of 2024.


The Federal Reserve Cuts Interest Rates by -0.50%

In 3Q24, the Fed started the process of normalizing interest rates after a volatile five years. To recap, the Fed cut interest rates to near-zero during the COVID-19 pandemic to support the economy. It kept rates near 0% until March 2022, when it began raising interest rates in response to soaring inflation. From March 2022 to July 2023, the central bank raised rates by +5%, one of the largest and fastest rate-hiking cycles in recent decades. The Fed held interest rates steady for over a year as it waited for inflation to return to its 2% target, and after 14 months, it started the rate-cutting cycle with a -0.50% cut at its September meeting.

The Fed’s transition to cutting interest rates comes as its focus shifts from lowering inflation to supporting the labor market. Since the last rate hike in July 2023, inflation has dropped from 3.3% to 2.6%. However, unemployment has risen from 3.5% to 4.2% over the same period, the highest level since October 2021. The Fed is more confident that inflation will return to its 2% target, but it is concerned about the health of the US labor market. The key question for the Fed and investors is what the labor market softening over the past year represents. Is the labor market simply normalizing after experiencing significant disruption during the pandemic, or is it an early sign of weakening labor demand? This uncertainty is one reason the Fed moved to cut interest rates.

Investors expect the Fed to cut interest rates at its two remaining meetings this year, with further reductions expected throughout 2025. The Fed funds futures chart shows the market’s rate-cut expectations. The market expects an additional -0.50% rate cut by the end of this year, followed by another -1.50% by the end of 2025. Investors are betting that the combination of falling inflation and rising unemployment will cause the Fed to implement significant rate cuts. History indicates the actual timing and amount of rate cuts will depend on the economy’s path. A weaker economy would justify more rate cuts, while a more robust economy could require fewer rate cuts. The next section examines how the Fed’s interest rate hikes have impacted the economy over the last 18 months.

Current Fed Funds Future Curve


Analyzing the Impact of the Fed’s Interest Rate Hikes on the US Economy

The four economic indicators that offer insight into the current state of the US economy are manufacturing PMI, housing starts, consumer credit, and retail sales. Each chart marks the start of the Fed’s tightening cycle in March 2022 to show the impact of interest rate hikes.

Together, these data points reveal the impact of rate hikes on the economy. Higher interest rates appear to be weighing on manufacturing, housing, and loan growth. However, the economy's main engine, the consumer, continues to spend. The data suggest that the current level of interest rates is restrictive, and the Fed’s goal in lowering rates is to stimulate interest-rate-sensitive sectors and prevent a deeper slowdown. Economists will monitor these data points in the coming months and quarters to gauge the impact of the Fed’s interest rate cuts on the economy.

Manufacturing PMI
The Manufacturing PMI (Purchasing Managers' Index) is a key gauge of manufacturing activity. Values above 50 indicate expansion, while those below 50 signal contraction. The pandemic triggered a sharp decline in manufacturing, followed by a strong recovery in 2021. However, since the Fed began raising interest rates, the PMI has steadily declined and remained below 50. This suggests the manufacturing sector is contracting, with higher interest rates likely putting downward pressure on the industry.

Manufacturing PMI

Housing Starts
Housing starts track the number of new residential construction projects, an important leading indicator and a key measure of housing market health. After dropping early in the pandemic, housing starts rebounded through early 2022. However, as the Fed raised interest rates, the number of housing starts declined. This downward trend reflects the impact of higher mortgage rates, which have reduced affordability and dampened construction activity.

Housing starts

Consumer Credit Outstanding
Consumer credit outstanding tracks the year-over-year change in consumer credit outstanding. This metric provides insight into the willingness of consumers to take on new debt, such as car and auto loans. Loan growth surged during the pandemic, fueled by fiscal stimulus, low interest rates, and rising wages. However, since the Fed began raising rates, loan growth has flatlined. Slowing loan growth can indicate that consumers are less willing or able to borrow due to higher interest rates, which can curb purchases of interest-rate-sensitive goods like homes, autos, and boats.

Consumer credit outstanding

Retail Starts
Consumer spending is a key driver of economic growth since it makes up a large portion of GDP. Retail sales plummeted as the economy shut down in the pandemic, but spending rebounded sharply in late 2020 and 2021. While retail sales growth has slowed with rising interest rates, it remains positive, indicating that consumer spending is holding up relatively well despite higher rates. The consumer’s willingness to keep spending has been a source of strength and economic resilience.

Retail Starts

Financial Markets Experience Increased Volatility

In early August, the stock and bond markets experienced significant volatility. Signs of investor angst started to appear during earnings season in July, when investors raised concerns about the high costs of developing artificial intelligence (AI) and whether future revenues would justify the expensive investments. A few weeks later, investors were spooked as unemployment rose from 4.1% to 4.3%. Investors worried the Fed had waited too long to cut rates and risked tipping the US economy into a recession that could be hard to reverse.

This sudden surge in market volatility caused investors to sell stocks and buy bonds, leading to a significant deleveraging event across global financial markets. The S&P 500 traded down nearly -8% from mid-July through the first week of August. However, the volatility was short-lived, and the S&P 500 rebounded to end August with a modest gain. There was some residual volatility in early September as investors returned from summer break, but the S&P 500 again recovered quickly and set a new all-time high later in the month. The rise in market volatility marks a significant shift from the past 12 months of steady S&P 500 gains, but investors have brushed it aside so far.


Equity Market Recap – Stocks Trade Higher as Investors Rotate Within the Market

Despite the volatility, the S&P 500 set multiple new all-time highs in 3Q24, adding to its list of new highs from earlier in the year. However, it was the change in stock market leadership that made headlines. The Equal-Weighted S&P 500, the Russell 2000, and the Value factor all outperformed the S&P 500, while the Growth factor underperformed. A similar pattern occurred at the sector level, with underperformers from the first half of 2024 outperforming in 3Q24. Interest-rate-sensitive sectors outperformed in anticipation of rate cuts, with the Utility and Real Estate sectors both gaining over +17%. Cyclical sectors, including Industrials, Financials, Consumer Discretionary, and Materials, also outperformed the S&P 500. In contrast, the Technology sector lagged the market rally, ending the quarter flat after outperforming in the year's first half.

Two key events, the Fed's first interest rate cut in September and growing concerns about AI's profitability, led to the change in market leadership in 3Q24. In the first half of 2024, uncertainty around Fed policy and concerns about the economy pushed investors toward large-caps and AI stocks. Meanwhile, smaller companies underperformed due to worries about their sensitivity to higher interest rates. With the Fed now officially cutting interest rates and doubts emerging about AI's monetization potential, investors sought out new investment opportunities in 3Q24.

International stocks outperformed US stocks in 3Q24 for the first time since 4Q22. The MSCI Emerging Market Index gained +7.7%, outperforming the S&P 500 by almost +2%. The MSCI EAFE Index of developed market stocks also outperformed the S&P 500, returning +6.8%. International stocks benefited from two themes: a weaker US dollar and AI companies’ underperformance during the stock market rotation. However, despite outperforming in 3Q24, the two major international indices are still underperforming year-to-date due to their lack of exposure to AI stocks.


Credit Market Recap – Bonds Trade Higher in Anticipation of Interest Rate Cuts

In 3Q24, bonds traded higher as investors prepared for the start of the Fed’s rate-cutting cycle. The 10-year Treasury yield fell from 4.37% at the end of June to 3.79% at the end of September. The 2-year yield, which is a proxy for investors’ rate cut expectations, fell from 4.72% to 3.64% over the same period. Falling Treasury yields boosted bonds overall, but there was an interesting dynamic within the credit market. The top two performing corporate bond groups were on opposite ends of the rating spectrum, but their returns were both linked to the start of rate cuts.

On one end, CCC-rated bonds, the lowest-rated and most sensitive to economic conditions, produced a total return of over +11% as corporate credit spreads tightened. The group’s outperformance suggests that investors expect interest rate cuts to stimulate economic growth and make refinancing easier. On the other end, AAA-rated bonds, the highest quality and most sensitive to interest rate changes, gained over +6% as the market priced in the first rate cut and yields fell. The two groups’ outperformance indicates that investors expect rate cuts to boost economic growth and relieve pressure on highly leveraged companies.

Credit spreads, which measure the difference in yield between two bonds of similar maturity but different credit quality, remain tight by historical standards. The chart below shows the credit spreads for corporate investment grade (IG) and high yield (HY) bonds over the past 20 years. The IG spread stands at 0.92%, meaning investors earn an extra +0.92% of yield by owning IG over similar Treasury bonds. Since 2004, the median IG spread has been 1.35%. The situation is similar for HY bonds, where the current spread is 3.14% compared to a median of 4.37%.

Corporate Credit Spreads vs Historical Averages

Corporate credit spreads vs historical avearges

The takeaway is that corporate bond investors are receiving less yield compensation for taking on corporate credit risk compared to the past 20 years. Credit spreads are often used to gauge financial conditions and investor sentiment toward the economy. Today’s tight spreads signal economic stability, strong market liquidity, investor willingness to buy risky assets, and low perceived default risk.


Fourth Quarter Outlook – Themes to Watch

With the Fed beginning to lower interest rates, investors are focused on what happens next. The two key questions are how much the Fed will cut interest rates and how the economy will respond to those rate cuts. The next six months will be critical in providing answers to these questions, and investors will analyze each economic data point for clues about the economy’s trajectory. This intense focus on economic data may have the unintended consequence of stabilizing market volatility as investors flip between optimism and pessimism.

The following chart demonstrates why the economy’s direction is important and tracks the S&P 500’s performance in the 12 months before and after the first interest rate cut. It features two paths. The dark blue line represents the S&P 500’s median return path when the economy avoids a recession in the 12 months following the first rate cut. The light blue line represents the S&P 500’s median return path when the economy enters a recession within 12 months after the first rate cut. For comparison, the two lines are indexed to 100 the week of the Fed’s first interest rate cut.

S&P 500 Returns After First Interest Rate Cut

SP 500 Returns after first interest rate cut

Historically, the S&P 500 has performed very differently depending on whether the economy falls into a recession after the first rate cut. When rate cuts stimulate economic growth, the S&P 500 gains an average of +23% over the next 12 months. However, if a recession follows, the S&P 500 produces an average return of -4%. Our team will monitor economic data in the coming months to see what impact interest rate cuts have on the economy.

As we wrap up this quarter’s market update, we want to touch on the upcoming presidential election briefly. With the election quickly approaching, you may wonder how the outcome will affect financial markets and whether you should change your investment strategy. Political views can stir strong emotions, but making investment choices based on those feelings can lead to poor portfolio decisions. Data suggests that whichever party occupies the White House has little to no impact on investment performance, with fundamental factors like corporate earnings growth and valuations impacting the stock market far more than political headlines. The US economy’s success, growth, and resiliency do not change with each new election, nor should your long-term investment strategy.

 

Important Disclosures
This material is provided for general and educational purposes only and is not investment advice. Your investments should correspond to your financial needs, goals, and risk tolerance. Please consult an investment professional before making any investment or financial decisions or purchasing any financial, securities, or investment-related service or product, including any investment product or service described in these materials.


Our Insights

Jonathan M. Elliott, CPWA®, CRPC®, CDFA®, ChSNC®, CPFA™, RMA®

I am currently the Managing Partner for our independent investment advisory firm, Optima Capital Management. Together with my business partners, Todd Bendell CFP® and Clinton Steinhoff, we founded Optima Capital in 2019 as a forward-thinking wealth management firm that serves as an investment fiduciary and family office for high-net-worth individuals and families. In addition to being the Chief Compliance Officer, my role at Optima Capital is portfolio management. I have over 18 years of experience in managing investment strategies and portfolios. I specialize in using fundamental and technical analysis to build custom portfolios that utilize individual equities, bonds, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). I began my financial services career with Merrill Lynch in 2003. At Merrill, I served in the leadership roles of Market Sales Manager and Senior Resident Director for the Scottsdale West Valley Market in Arizona. On Wall Street Magazine recognized me as one of the Top 100 Branch Managers in 2017. I am originally from Saginaw, Michigan, and a marketing graduate from the W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University. I am a Certified Private Wealth Advisor® professional. The CPWA® certification program is an advanced credential created specifically for wealth managers who work with high net worth clients, focusing on the life cycle of wealth: accumulation, preservation, and distribution. In addition, I hold the following designations - Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor (CRPC®), Certified Divorce Financial Analyst (CDFA®), Certified Plan Fiduciary Advisor (CPFA), and Retirement Management Advisor (RMA®). In the community, I am a member of the Central Arizona Estate Planning Council (CAEPC) and serve as an alumni advisor and mentor to student organizations at Arizona State University. My interests include traveling, outdoors, fitness, leadership, entrepreneurship, minimalism, and computer science.

Previous
Previous

Recession Fears Fade on Strong Labor Market Data

Next
Next

The Fed Kicks Off the Rate-Cutting Cycle